Desertfication of Indus Basin
Iqbal Mustafa

Printed in NEWS August 22, 2004


Quo Vadis
Whither are you Going

For this new series of columns, I have symbolically chosen the title from the call of the Roman guards when they addressed passers by: Quo Vadis, where are you going? In the previous series, 'Inside view' I took a retrospective approach, dilating upon many areas that affect our lives by dint of institutional management of the country. While responding positively many readers complained that I was finding faults but not proffering solutions.

In this series, I am taking a prospective view of things where we can look at the paths ahead and the choices available. There is no certainty in determining destiny but it certainly helps knowing a little about the paths ahead.

Iqbal Mustafa.
February 2004

In this series of columns I have been writing about metaphorical desertification of governance, ethics, politics, economics, arts and social values. This week lets talk about down to earth (no pun intended) physical desertification of the fertile plains of the Indus Basin Irrigation System. If a holistic and futuristic view is taken of this crisis, all other problems of the country pale before it.

Let us get through the numbers first. The total cultivated area of Pakistan is 22.76 million hectares out of which around 80% is irrigated while the remaining 20% is rain-fed. The irrigated area is mainly comprised of Indus Basin Irrigation System (IBIS) irrigated by canals and tube wells. The Indus River and its tributaries, on an average, bring 154 MAF of water annually. This includes 144.91 MAF from the three Western rivers and 9.14 MAF from the Eastern rivers. Most of this, about 104.73 MAF, is diverted for irrigation. 39.4 MAF flows to the sea and about 9.9 MAF is consumed by the system losses, which include evaporation, seepage and spills during floods. It is reported that 5.51 hectare-meter water is required for optimum growth of various crops while only 2.77 hectare-meter water is available at farm through fresh water (canal system) resources. There is a shortfall of about 50 percent in irrigation water required for optimum crop needs.

In order to meet that shortfall, the system utilizes over 44 MAF of groundwater, pumped through more than 500,000 tube wells, in addition to the canal supplies. In the Punjab, the agricultural heartland, over 60 percent of irrigation water comes from tubewells. However, the problem is not simply that of quantity.

National Drainage Strategy (2001-2025) states that about 33 million tons of salts are annually brought into the IBIS and 18.5 million tons (56%) of those are leached into the ground water through direct seepage. Because of this, latest surveys indicate that 36 percent of ground water is highly saline (over 3000 mg/l or TDS), 15 percent is marginal (between 1000 and 3000 TDS) and 49 percent is below the safe limit of 1000 TDS. Most of these ground water sources are located in the canal commanded areas. Out of the 49 percent ground water that is nominally fit in terms of total salts, there is problem of sodicity - sodium carbonates and bicarbonates, measured in Residual Sodium Carbonate (RSC). A recent survey of Lahore district shows that 70 percent of tubewells have high RSC (over 3). The ultimate situation is that around 65 to 70 percent of groundwater in the Indus Basin is either saline or sodic. This is turning the existing situation even worse by making already degraded soils saltier and subsequently less productive.

The government's unidirectional approach to the problem is quantitative. The goals of the government for the development of water resources are reflected in the WAPDA Vision 2025 document, which stipulates the addition of 64 MAF of storage capacity and about 27,000 MW of additional power - mainly through hydel sources, by the year 2025. The estimated investment for Vision 2025 will be $50 billion spread over the next 25 years. It does not even begin to understand the qualitative problem.

In this brief column, I can only provide an overview of the various dimensions of the water situation in the country.

To begin with, flood irrigation is not a natural way to provide water to the plants. Over millenniums, plants and soils have evolved under rainwater. Man invented irrigation to increase production in arid zones artificially. Over the past century, it has become quite evident that surface irrigation produces environmental side effects that eventually become counter-productive. Donor agencies have realized this since past two decades and will not finance any new dams for surface irrigation. Simply put, flood irrigation is the most inefficient way to water crops and produces secondary salinisation.

Indus Basin has practised flood irrigation extensively since past hundred odd years and salinisation of soils is becoming critical now. In quantitative terms, at best flood irrigation is 20 to 40 percent efficient - this much water is used by plants; the rest either leeches down or evaporates. On this count, Pakistan's water shortage could, theoretically, be solved by adopting advanced irrigation technologies like sprinkler, drip or underground by-valve systems that are over 90 percent efficient. Conversion to these methods would reduce salinisation by 50 percent since less water (with fewer salts) would be going into the soils. Adoption of advanced irrigation techniques is inconceivable under present circumstances where agriculture technology has not come out of the 'Mohenjo Daro' era as yet in the country. It would require a quantum shift in socio-politico-economic equilibrium of the system for which neither resources nor vision nor the political will exists.

Inefficient use of water has another implication, besides agricultural application. Most developed countries allocate at least 40 percent of available clean water for urban-industrial use. In Pakistan less than 10 percent is used by non-agricultural sectors. If, by any miracle Pakistan were to develop in to an industrial, middle income country, about 30 percent of water will need to be diverted to urban consumption. Given the current utilisation patterns, agriculture will suffer fatal cuts in the primary resource of production. It is simply not tenable!

Water pollution from urban-industrial effluents is proliferating in geometric progressions. Adding to salinisation from ground water and salts being washed down from the catchment areas of rivers (due to lack of range management and deforestation), the drainage of toxic urban refuse-water and industrial chemicals into the rivers and canals is causing havoc with canal water quality. There are no official figures available, but I personally know that there are hardly any canals in middle and lower Punjab where canal water is totally fit for irrigation. I have measured pH of over 8 (should be between 7 - 7.5) in most canals with TDS of around 1500 which is marginal. At this rate, it will not be long before canal water becomes as toxic as water from 70 percent of tubewells.

As I drove down to Bahawalpur last week, the cotton planted with a vengeance this year (in anticipation of high prices of last year) was almost screaming about contaminated soils. In spite of heavy rains and large doses or urea, growth is stunted with early flowering reaching up to the top of the plants. The plants are showing signs of latent hunger as high levels of salts in the soils are blocking uptake of nutrients.

Economic planners in Islamabad and Lahore would be well advised to surface from piles of statistical data and have a peek at bio-chemical forces at work in water sector. Francis Bacon said, "Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed." As in other areas of national policies, the consequences of our defiance in this sector are looming as a slow desertification of the Indus Basin has already begun.

Iqbal Mustafa
1140 words
21 August 2004