Crystal Ball reflections
Iqbal Mustafa

Printed in NEWS February 27, 2005


Quo Vadis
Whither are you Going

For this new series of columns, I have symbolically chosen the title from the call of the Roman guards when they addressed passers by: Quo Vadis, where are you going? In the previous series, 'Inside view' I took a retrospective approach, dilating upon many areas that affect our lives by dint of institutional management of the country. While responding positively many readers complained that I was finding faults but not proffering solutions.

In this series, I am taking a prospective view of things where we can look at the paths ahead and the choices available. There is no certainty in determining destiny but it certainly helps knowing a little about the paths ahead.

Iqbal Mustafa.
February 2004

Countries or nations are like living organisms; they have a biology. They evolve, adapt, metamorphose and in this they follow quite a predictable life process. They respond to forces - historical continuity, ecological changes, geopolitical vectors, mineral discoveries, technological developments and so forth. Not so Pakistan! It is a political entity with infinite capacity for genetic mutations in rapid and continuous successions, like a bionic creature that can morph into different forms at random.

From a chaotic political plurality of the fifties, it mutated into a monolithic dictatorship of the sixties; the capitalistic fast growth of the sixties turned into socialistic economic rot in the seventies after the genetic segregation of its east wing. The socialist ideals of the sixties transformed into theological dogmas of the eighties. The remote controlled democratic order (or disorder) of the nineties was a potpourri of all past phases of existence. Privatisation, globalisation and free market transition coexisted with fanatical religious ethos while the socialistic ideals of the seventies were not fully abandoned either. The musical chairs game of political merry-go-round became a reminiscence of the fifties, except that two major political parties had emerged along with the rising power of the religious right wing parties.

Then, there was a terminal twist in 1999 as General Musharraf severed the evolving political ethos of the nineties with a proclamation of intent for a thorough house-cleaning job. The brooms and dusters to clean the grime were soon abandoned as the grime was embraced in a new political order along with the religious parties to provide a fig leaf to legitimacy of the rule. The two main political parties that had emerged over the past fifteen years in the country were excommunicated and cannibalised to cobble together strange new political factions with no logical genealogy. The illusion that Pakistan had found a Mahathir or a Lee Quan Yu soon turned murky as the President and the Prime Minister barricaded themselves behind the best personal security any head of state can afford. Their isolation is more than physical; they have stopped listening to the pulse of the nation as opposition forces, from all directions, are driving wedges into their insecure existence.

The resolve and claims of providing continuity for economic stability has given way to uncertainties again, as the rodeo ride is getting rougher for the President. The problem with a country like Pakistan is that no rational or conjectural predictions are possible for the future. One can see, with a fair amount of certainty, where other countries or regions are heading for - e.g India, China, Europe, even the US but not Pakistan. One has to turn to a crystal bowl to peer into the future. It is, in fact, the favourite national past time since no other country has so many TV programs on political issues - strange for a country with such low literacy levels! At least one-third of air time on PTV, GEO, Indus and ARY is dedicated to crystal bowl gazing.

In a recent TV interview, Nawab Akbar Bugti came through as a bold, rational, realistic and a visionary person but even he related to the Baluch cult of bone-reading! He didn't claim a true faith in the craft of bone-reading but recounted instances where predictions made through deciphering signs in bones had come true in the past e.g. break up of East Pakistan and dismissal of Nawaz Shareef's government in the first term.

In a column, 'In the mirror of history' (15th February, 2005) Shahid Javed Burki wrote, "There is no doubt that if President Musharraf succeeds in his Pakistan project, he would have earned for himself a position in history close to that of Mohammad Ali Jinnah. This is not an exaggerated judgment for his success would have created a new Pakistan.

If he fails, the result would be equally spectacular not just for the country that he leads but for the entire world. If Musharraf's Pakistan project does not succeed and if Pakistan flounders, it would produce tremors that will be felt well beyond the country's immediate borders - a political tsunami that could create havoc around the globe." His crystal bowl seems murky, as he cannot see which possibility is more plausible or perhaps he does not want to share it with us, yet.
So what else is the crystal bowl reflecting? A ready-to-die old man in Baluchistan is showing a red rag to a General in the hope of provoking his trigger-happy temper, luring him into another misadventure. What is the old man going to gain by doing so? Three things, 1) He will gain immortality as a martyr. 2) He will forge unity amongst Baluch tribes as no one has ever before - no army person is going to be safe if the old man is killed in action, for as long as the last Baluch is alive. 3) He will shake the hegemonic foundations of Islamabad's Federalism by coercing concessions of greater autonomy for the provinces as enshrined in the 1973 constitution. The wise old man knows his strength! He is ready to die for his cause.

Fortunately, a Ruler is not playing on the front foot anymore! Gone is the commando assertive certainty of doing things 'his' way. His sabre rattling bravado has mellowed to conciliatory gestures on all the fronts he had opened up - perhaps one too many as he has begun to realise. In Waziristan, in Baluchistan and with expatriate opposition leaders, he is trying to mend fences by retracting his hard stance of the recent past.

He has realised the Mohammad Ali (Boxer) doctrine, "He who hits and runs away lives to fight another day." Having failed in producing an alternative political leadership in his 'kings party' for performing convincingly at the next polls, whenever they are, he is offering deals to Benazir and Nawaz Shareef that they can't refuse. He can only mitigate the mounting international and domestic pressure to step out of the uniform if he secures another term as the head of state through not so tacit concurrence of the two populist leaders sitting abroad who are weary of being out in the cold. So, next round of elections (er.. selections) will install 'B' teams of PPPP and PML (N) lead by flamboyant Zardari and dour Shahbaz Shareef, as their respective leaders wait it out abroad. Democracy will gain credence; the Ruler will get perpetuity while the PML(Q) alliance dissolves having served its purpose, many of its members unabashedly melting back into their parent folds. Three chairs for all of them… hip hip hoorah!

What about the cantonments in Baluchistan? Will they come up and for whom - the Baluchi recalcitrant elements or as joint-venture bases against international terrorism? My crystal bowl is too clouded to see that far.

Iqbal Mustafa
email: mustafa@hujra.com
1120 words
25 February 2005