The termite of injustice
Iqbal Mustafa

Printed in NEWS 25 January 2004


Inside View

This is a series of columns I have started writing from June, 2003 for NEWS. I had imposed a moratorium on my writing for the past seven years since I was attached to the government, first in the capacity of a member of the Central Board of State Bank, and then as CEO, SMEDA.

Now that I am back in the 'civies', so to say, the itch to sharpen my pen became irresistable. This series "Inside View" is based on the experiences and perspectives I gained being an 'insider' for all these years. This is an inside view of an outsider.

Iqbal Mustafa.
June, 2003

The Human Development Report of UNDP, 2003, ranks Pakistan 143 out of 175 in Human Development Index, based on basic criteria like life expectancy, literacy rate, education index and per capita incomes. Countries below Pakistan are mostly highly destitute African countries. In another survey on 'quality of life index' Pakistan rates even lower in global ranking. While such statistical evaluations based on cold numbers, provide useful benchmarks for development planners, fundamental social vectors that determine rankings do not emerge.

Aristotle declared, "It is in justice that the ordering of society is centered." History of civilizations and political development of cultures has been anchored to the search for an order that ensures justice to masses, or at least creates a goodwill based on an illusion of fair play for the majority. In his treatise on social philosophy, 'the Aristos', John Fowles observes, "Social stagnation is most likely to occur in extreme societies - extremely just or extremely unjust - and must lead to one of three things: war, decay or revolution."

It is hard to equate justice in a society with prosperity empirically, never the less; there is a strong co-relation in the end. Unjust societies may expand and prosper for a while but eventually crumble as human dissatisfactions erode its foundations. On the other hand, just societies need not become super powers but they do enjoy stability and longevity to earn the loyalty and respect of their populace - Switzerland for example.

Since Pakistan has seemingly averted the looming disaster of implosion under external pressures although fissures are ominously increasing, it would be opportune to take stock of this aspect of communal harmony. Does Pakistan qualify as a just society by and large? There are no absolutes in this regard, obviously, but we can address this issue in relative terms. A simple indicator would be the general 'resentment' levels in various sectors of the society. Let us not mistake resentment for a healthy need of economic re-adjustments that people in most developed democracies constantly clamour for. Resentments are strong feelings against a system which is perceived to have loaded the dice in favour of one segment of society or the other on a permanent basis.

On that count, society in Pakistan harbours dangerously high levels of resentment. Beginning with distribution of wealth, the disparities are stark and wide. One doesn't need to delve into Gini coefficients to see that economic disparity, large to begin with, is on the rise in Pakistan especially in the rural areas. The overwhelming majority of people in Pakistan attribute the widening gulf to unfair means and advantages. Political patronage and corruption are two areas where social murkiness cannot be concealed by any means which provides sustenance to criminal activities and extremist militancy. History teaches that economic inequities are fertile grounds for revolutions or anarchy.

Next, there is a rural-urban divide that polarises society like chalk and cheese. The visual manifestation is dramatic. Driving a few kilometres out of the municipal limits of any city transports you into a different world. The dearth of infrastructure, utilities and commercial facilities in rural areas lag behind urban areas by at least half a century; the mindset by at least a whole century. Two of the worst aspects of urbanisation have seeped into the rural areas with opening of roads - social alienation and naked materialism of consumerism - but none of the benefits have spread out. It was always true that Pakistan hides its real poverty in the rural areas but there used to be an innocent serenity to villages that proximity to nature brings - the simple, wholesome life. Now, the villages are turning into large ghettos of filth, squalor, ignorance and pollution of horrendous scale. Agricultural economy was held hostage to 'industry-friendly' macro policies for a long time; now the tyranny of 'free market economy' is bleeding the farmers in the absence of equitable market mechanisms like forward trading and commodity warehouses. Impoverished agriculture sector is becoming increasingly uncompetitive as trade borders open up. Land fragmentation, a product of Muslim Laws of inheritance and politically motivated, draconian land reforms, pre-empts economies of scale in agricultural production. Hence capital flows from rural to urban areas and never returns back. Rural society has been reduced to captive producers and captive consumers. Show me a satisfied farmer (barring those whose elders left them miles of orchards) and I will show you a pot of gold at the end of every rainbow.

The civil-military divide has its own stark realities. The military, by the dint of its long tradition of being in power and insularity from civil scrutiny even in times of civilian rules, has assumed the stature of a social class in itself. Military service bestows certain privileges that greatly enhance access to resources (land and services). The military as an establishment competes with civilian society in every area with clear institutional advantages. So great is the divide that mutual distrust and suspicions have hardened between the civilian and the military mindsets. Both perceive one another as naïve in matters of the very approach to life.

Bureaucracy, for its own genesis, has created an elitist class of services that has a distinctive character and mindset. Private sector, especially the business community over whose life-lines bureaucracies rule, cannot relate to the ways of the officialdom and consequently either find loopholes in laws or purchase discretionary powers to proliferate corruption and subvert fair play.
The political arena is divided by all the schisms described above and provincial disharmonies to add. The three smaller provinces are always at logger heads with the federation which is dominated by the one larger province. Sense of inequity runs high on provincial issues for the past fifty years. Cultural fabric is split between 'anglophiles' who enjoy an English based world view and the 'vernaculars' to whom it is denied through educational handicaps. The vernaculars have a strong sense of disadvantage against anglophiles in most walks of life.

Justice is not the exclusive domain of judicial system. That is only an arbitrator of conflicting interests in a society, and itself subject to a dictates of country's governance sense. Justice is an ethos of governance and reflects in every aspect of a community's life. It begins at the top where leaders embrace a sense of equity and fair play with an enlightened self-interest and far-sightedness. The order of governance justice trickles down the power hierarchies to the individual levels. Fragmentation of society into several groups based on power advantage erodes the morality of justice in individuals. This way it becomes a spiral where individual impulses create governance inequities that further re-enforce the temptations to subvert justice in the name of survival.
Majority of people in Pakistan have lost faith in a prosperous future, a fact corroborated by exponential increase in visa and migration applications with foreign embassies. It is not merely the economic deprivations or the lure of affluence in the West that has dismayed people. There is a pervading sense of injustice in society that is eroding the faith of people. Ideological red-herrings drawn in the name of nationalism are beginning to sound hollow.

General Musharraf and his capable team of managers are doing a commendable job of reviving economic indicators but they must not lose sight of the fundamental need for justice in a society. While fire-fighting on many immediate ends, they cannot afford to ignore that the termite of injustice, born out of the myopia I spoke about last week, is eating away the roots of our society. It would take generations to produce a society of individuals with internal sense of justice. The incumbents will have to take some tough measures to stall the rot setting in from the foundations if their efforts today are to bear fruits tomorrow.


Iqbal Mustafa
24 January 2004
1280 words